Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights

Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay (2008) IMDB rating: 7.00 Plot: Follows the cross-country adventures of the pot-smoking duo as they try to outrun authorities who suspect them of being terrorists when they try to sneak a bong on board their flight to Amsterdam.

Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay

Actors: Cho John,Penn Kal,Corddry Rob,Conley Jack,Bart Roger,Harris Neil Patrick,Winter Eric,Reep Jon,Munoz Mark,Adomian James,Voltz Todd,Christy Richard,Herschman Adam,Beals Jackson,Talai Amir,Adventure,Comedy,

How Much Should I ask for this DVD Lot?
I have a lot of 265 dvd’s. I was wondering how much I should set the reserve price for an ebay auction. These are the movies:

2 Fast 2 Furious
6 Days 7 Nights
8 Mile (x2)
10,000 BC
50 First Dates
300
A Man Apart
Accepted-Wide Screen
Ace Ventura When Nature Calls
A history of Violence
Al Capone Biography
Along Came a spider
Alpha Dog-Full Screen
American Gangster- 2 Disc Unrated Extended Edition
American Pie- Unrated (x3)
American Pie 2- Unrated (x2)
American Wedding- Unrated
Anger Management
Apollo 13
Austin Powers Gold Member
Bad Boys 2
Bad News Bear
Batman
Beef 3
Behind Enemy Lines
Black Mask
Boiler Room
Boiler Room-New
Boondock Saints
Bruce Lee Fists of Fury
Cabin Boy
Carlitos Way
Carlitos Way: Rise to Power
Casino
Cast Away(x2)
Charlie

Casper’s Scare School (2009) IMDB rating: 0.00 Plot: Casper is going back to school to learn how to how to scare people. While Casper is at Scare School he discovers a plot by the headmasters to take over the world. Join Casper and his friends on this journey to save the world from evil and have some fun along the way!

Actors: Animation

Who are these cartoon Characters?
In the children’s cartoon Casper’s Scare School, there are two skeleton girls with faces painted like Sugar skulls. A blond and a pink haired girl, I’d love to know their names for reference, so I can find pictures on Google image, I’m having no such luck!

Please help!

---

Hello ,
"2 Skeleton Twins :
2 twins who are skeletons. They are Thatch’s henchmen until in the end of the film. The make-up on the twins faces resembles mexican Day Of The Dead skulls."
I don’t think they have names .

=^,,^=

=^,,^= | Jun 17, 2009

Perfect World, A (1993) IMDB rating: 7.20 Plot: A Perfect World touches you from the bottom of your heart. It is a story about a man and a boy. A man escapes from a prison with his partner who he does not like. After escaping, they kidnap a little boy. It is not a simple kidnapping story as people expect with violence and blood. This man, as he describes himself, is not a good guy, but not the worst either. The boy, living with his mom and two sisters, follows their family??s religion, which forbids him from celebrating Halloween, celebrating Christmas, participating in parties, and pretty much any fun common for children of his age. The man gives the boy opportunities to play the games that he wants to, tells him what is wrong and what is right, and asks him to be independent and make his own choices.

buy Perfect World, A and instant download

Actors: Costner Kevin,Eastwood Clint,Lowther T.J.,Szarabajka Keith,Burmester Leo,Hewitt Paul,Whitford Bradley,McKinnon Ray,Cox Darryl,Whiteaker Jay,Drama,Crime,Thriller,

How do i get my PC stereo headset to work in ventrillo?
I play perfect world and i just downloaded ventrillo, but when i plugged in my Pc headset I could hear them but they couldn’t hear me. So can anyone tell me how to make it so that they can hear me speak as well?

---

Make sure you headset microphone is selected in the "Setup" dialog under "Input Device".
b3george | Feb 05, 2010

Possession (1981) IMDB rating: 7.10 Plot: A young woman left her family for an unspecified reason. The husband determines to find out the truth and starts following his wife. At first, he suspects that a man is involved. But gradually, he finds out more and more strange behaviors and bizarre incidents that indicate something more than a possessed love affair.

i get this movie here Possession in DivX quaity

Actors: Neill Sam,Bennent Heinz,Duering Carl,Lawton Shaun,Hogben Michael,Ruthlein Maximilian,Frey Thomas,Neubert Gerd,Drama,Horror,

Do I have a case in small claims court with nothing in writing and nothing signed?
My mom died in 1997 and after she passed away, my father put their house in my name because I am the executor of their estate. He wanted the house in my name in case he got sick or something happened to him. My father passed in 2007 and I had the deed to the house. I have 5 siblings and we decided to sell the house to one of my brothers. The deal was that he pay $20,000 for the house, and one of my sisters gave up her shares. So, my brother (and his wife) is to pay $335 a month to each of the siblings that are left to receive their share. Each sibling gets paid $335 a month for one year until we have all been paid (5 years time). When they moved into the house, I signed the deed over to them, on the notion that they would pay everyone. The only paper that was drawn up states who gets paid when. Nothing was signed by me, my brother or his wife, and he has the deed in his name.
Now, here is the problem. The first two siblings have been paid, but now my brother and his wife have fallen on hard times and have not been able to pay (right now, they are supposed to be paying me and then they have two more siblings to pay). If I take them to small claims court, do you think I have a case considering I didn’t get anything in writing and the deed is in his name already and he has possession of the deed?

---

Yes, you have a chance, but do you really want to sue your brother? Ask him for a promissory note instead.
Pressed Rat | Feb 04, 2010

---

The prior proof of payments paid to you will enforce your verbal agreement should you choose to take this to court. I would try and settle for interest to be tacked on before taking it to court, it’s not going to help you getting paid any faster if they Truly fallen on hard times. You can’t get blood from a stone.
Joe B | Feb 04, 2010

---

You could try but considering they have fallen on hard times they can’t give you what they don’t have. In the end all it will do is cause friction and ill feelings in the family.
beatlefan911 | Feb 04, 2010

Incubus (1981) IMDB rating: 4.30 Plot: In the small New England town of Galen, a young teenage boy claims he has dreams of young women being brutally raped and murdered. A doctor (John Cassavetes) and the local sheriff (John Ireland) discover that the boy’s dreams are real and that a sinister occult might be behind the brutual murders.

find and download Incubus in iPod/iPhone quaity

Actors: Cassavetes John,Ireland John,McIntosh Duncan,Atkin Harvey,Ditson Harry,Birman Matt,Young Brian,Lee Wes,Dainard Neil,Horror,Thriller,

incubus?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?
im a music remixer and i was wondering if anyone knew where i could get the song "drive by incubus"? I WANT ONLY THE BEAT!!! NO LYRICS OR WORDS

---

I don’t think you can work with them, but there are karaoke versions on Youtube, just the music with vocals removed. Some are better than others… you could also try uploading the mp3 of Drive into Audacity, split the stereo tracks, invert the bottom one, set both to mono and try to see if the vocals are removed leaving only the music.

Jon | Aug 04, 2009

The Plague (2006) IMDB rating: 4.20 Plot: An adrenaline filled weekend of party’s, drugs, and violence seen through the eyes of four multicultural friends living in the melting pot that is Londons’ inner city estates.

buy The Plague and instant download

Actors: Anoyke Samuel,Ash Nick,Bonnick Jr. David,Burnside Mike,Campbell Jake,Campbell Richie,Chambers Christopher,Clargo Adrian,Clift Matt,Davis Iain,Douglas Thaddaeus,Drake Jeremy,Duma Tony,Ewulo Isaac,Fain James G.,Drama,

Why is it that so many atheists are having difficulties challenging Peter Murphy's statements below?
The question that arises about nature is: is it a creation, eternal to nature, or an accident within nature. The Deist will maintain that it is a creation, but Deists will differ as to degree of involvement on the part of the Creator in the process. The atheist will counter that it is either eternal, or accidental. The final resolution of this problem will eventually be up to science to settle.

To begin, let us look at nature as an ever changing and shifting painting. Science attempts to understand what the paint and canvass is composed of, the relationship of the individual paints, and the brushstrokes that are involved in the final product. But, what about the painter? If one admits that nature is similar to a painting, than it is not too far a leap to conclude that a painter exists, or at least existed at one time.

The atheist continually resorts to the logical fallacy known as argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to modesty) when dealing with Deists or even theists. The appeal here is to science as an authority which cannot be challenged. Unfortunately, this appeal is plagued by its own problems.

First of all, science makes no claims about God one way or another, so it is not the scientists who are for the most part claiming God does not exist on the grounds that there is a lack of evidence, but the scientific layman asserting it.

Second, science for all its great accomplishments is still in the infant stage, there is much about nature it simply does not know, even on this planet. So to conclude that a discipline, which has limitations here and now, somehow can conclude that something beyond its immediate ability to study is the final word, is logically speaking, a fallacy.

Science itself is somewhat bias as well. It suffers from nearsightedness; what it cannot observe directly or indirectly, it ignores. Things like memory may have a basis in biology, but is it safe to conclude that only biology is at work here? No one has ever seen an emotion, or a memory; yet they exist. So it is not far-fetched to conclude that there is more to nature than what we observe in our own limited corner of it. Science has only touched the tip of the scientific iceberg — as such, science cannot be used to dismiss the idea that a God may exist. If one cannot truly understand a grain of sand, then one cannot understand the beach.

So where does the Deist stand? The Deist recognizes the limitations of belief; but still possesses the courage to believe. The belief in God in no more illogical than the belief in Extraterrestrial life forms. Nevertheless, despite the present lack of evidence for E.T. life forms, few scientists would outright dismiss them. If one accepts that E.T. life forms may exist, then one must conclude that such life forms could be far superior to us in knowledge and power — if so, then God is in a sense, could be regarded as an E.T. life form as well. Or more accurately an Extradimensional life form. Such a being, or beings, cannot be dismissed as impossibilities.

The atheist demands that the Deist, or theist, provide evidence for the existence of God. They continually resort to logical fallacies of their own, for example, a common one is the Petitio principii (begging the question) fallacy; it goes something like this: there is no God because we find no evidence of God in nature. But is this true? No. We presently do not know enough about nature to make such a conclusion, eventually, the possibility that there is a God could be proven. The atheist has no evidence that the universe is eternal or accidental; they are assuming that scientific speculation somehow equals scientific fact. Obviously there is a great gap between speculation and fact to the rational mind.

We have the painting, but to dismiss that there is a painter is illogical, unless there is evidence that it is either an eternal painting or an accident. So far all science has offered is speculation based on drawing inferences from the available data [which is far from complete]; nevertheless, since the evidence is not complete, nor fully understood, sweeping generalizations by atheist on what exists and does not exist are groundless.

Atheists like to shift the burden of proof from themselves to their debating opponents; in short, the believer in God must prove God, but the atheist will not defend his position that the universe is either eternal or accidental. Often this tactic works, the believer will then try to make an argument for God, only to have the atheist demand that the believer first define God in some clear manner. Once the believer makes this mistake, he loses the debate. We are still in the process of understanding the painting, so trying to define the painter is doomed to failure; the believer must recognize this tactic and avoid it. Deists should feel free to openly state that there is absolutely no evidence against a Creator being, or a Creation, and that all skeptics have to offer is scientific speculatio
on very limited data. Deists believe there is something more; that is not unreasonable, it is very much human and rational. That "more" is God. Deists are willing to wait for the answer and are keeping an open mind on the matter; it is the atheists, who fear waiting. Simply put there is no evidence against God, nor is there evidence against a Creation [design]. The burden of proof does not lie on the open mind, but on the closed dogmatic mind which assumes that we already know all there is to know
$500 for any atheist who can successfully refute his statements.

---

Good grief, you think anyone is going to sift through all that?
discord71 | Feb 03, 2010

---

What is to challenge when he presents a false dichotomy in the first sentence, builds a strawman out of it and bases everything on that?
Old Man from Scene 24 | Feb 03, 2010

---

Because he never heard of editing.
ungodly | Feb 03, 2010

---

*snore*
Abby C | Feb 03, 2010

---

The smartest people in this section as of right now are agnostics.

Until we advance, say, 1000 years from now, we may not know how to test the super natural being like a god. Therefore, believing, or not believing is completely useless, until we can prove something like this exists.

I fully support what has been said, and to say a god doesn’t exists or exists is really stupid, because we as a species aren’t advanced enough to come to a logical conclusion.

P.S. A lot of the things written in this are really… horrible. I only agree with the fact that it’s impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a god.
Michael H | Feb 03, 2010

---

perhaps no one wants to read all that you posted. Got a condensed version?
Jenn | Feb 03, 2010

---

Why is it so hard for anyone to believe that not every one is going to share your views. So what if they don’t agree, does that some how challenge your faith. In truth if your faith is strong it should make your faith stronger. Get over it and move on with your life.
conundrum_dragon | Feb 03, 2010

---

False dichotomy in the first sentence. Wow….that was easy. I thought you said it was tough.
Gazoo | Feb 03, 2010

---

I read through most of the above, and must protest to the assumption that atheists automatically challenge the views of theists and deists.

Actually, I believe deists have some pretty strong arguments going for them. Most deists I’ve met make a lot of sense since they tend not to be pretentious and claim they have all the answers. I always thought that deists and atheists got along, in general, better than many other groups.

Edit: I agree with Michael H, it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of divine entities like gods. This is in part why I am repelled from religions that claim to know everything and are 100% positive in every minute detail of their beliefs. I find that agnostics and deists usually have the most honest and logical arguments.
Isobel | Feb 03, 2010

---

1. First sentence is a straw man.
2. Atheists don’t shift the burden of proof. The fact that you believe this makes it obvious as to why you believe in a deity in the first place… You fail logic 101…
Matt the Crimson | Feb 03, 2010

---

I still do not understand why the concept of a god gets some sort of an exemption that no one allows Santa Claus or fairies.
Actually, I do understand, people are told there is a god of some kind everywhere. It still does not make it any more valid.
Herbie | Feb 03, 2010

---

That’s just typical crap. The writer of that drivel assumes that atheists think a godless universe means it’s an "accident." Classic straw man.
Desiree | Feb 03, 2010

---

I think that most atheists would not have any problem challenging these. They are good arguments, but they are not very compelling, and are easily refuted.
Fred | Feb 03, 2010

---

simple..its long winded,circular in its argument, bases its argument on fantasy the beliefs of the gullible, and is full of holes and half truths…for one example to humor you "the believer in god must prove god"-WRONG clever though he changes a few words to make it seem an easy win…the argument is in actuality-"the onus is on the believer to prove there is SOMETHING where there is evidence of nothing"-innocent until proven guilty…for the record i believe there may be some higher power that made all this but she certainly could use a better PR rep…and that its ok to not know all the answers ..far better than pretending you do with your evidence based in ramblings of middle eastern madmen from 2-3000 years ago..its wordiness did make me chuckle however
postieramone | Feb 03, 2010

---

"Atheists like to shift the burden of proof from themselves to their debating opponents; in short, the believer in God must prove God, but the atheist will not defend his position that the universe is either eternal or accidental. Often this tactic works, the believer will then try to make an argument for God, only to have the atheist demand that the believer first define God in some clear manner. Once the believer makes this mistake, he loses the debate. We are still in the process of understanding the painting, so trying to define the painter is doomed to failure; the believer must recognize this tactic and avoid it."

I’ll challenge this right here. The only way for a theist or deist to have a chance in this debate is to leave the terms undefined. If you can’t define what the painter is, it doesn’t make much sense for you to use it as an analogy. That’s just intellectually dishonest.

I do have an open mind. I admit there may be something more, but unless you can support any notion of this with evidence… I’m under no obligation to believe you unless I take it as a matter of faith. You can’t do this because you can’t even define what it is you’re trying to prove.

Define it and provide evidence.
puredagnastyevil | Feb 03, 2010

---

Most theists that I communicate with believe in a loving and all-powerful God who knows all and they assume that if anyone does not believe the same then they don’t believe in God. They have no capacity for seeing God in another way. I see Nature as God, but I don’t look for a fairy tale explanation of its origin. God has no love but it does have a bond in that we are all a part of it. It is not all-powerful either; it has limitations on its spread of life. As for God’s omniscience, there is not a central brain that runs everything or is conscious of everything.
moryonder | Feb 03, 2010

---

You dismiss fact, evidence and reality and claim you know better because you have wishful thinking – surely proving it is not an intelligent option you are trying to promote!!
Sage | Feb 04, 2010

Devil’s Advocate, The (1997) IMDB rating: 7.10 Plot: Based on a book by Andrew Neiderman, the film centers on a young lawyer who joins a New York firm only to discover that his boss has an increasingly bizarre personality.

Actors: Reeves Keanu,Pacino Al,Jones Jeffrey,Nelson Craig T.,Santiago-Hudson Ruben,Ruginis Vyto,Wyner George,Drama,Thriller,

Why can't Republicans play devils advocate towards our foreign policy?
The party has no fear to criticize our social and domestic spending policies but when it comes to our extremely flawed foreign policy it’s hands off for them?

Why is that few Republicans will criticize foreign policy and 95% of the party supported the Bush doctrine during the Bush admin?

A government that policies the world, has a preemptive foreign policy, and runs a world wide welfare state is the peak of a large government. How can the house Republicans simultaneously support limited government yet support the biggest government expenditure yet, and that’s our useless and out of control foreign policy?
MikeGolf good, I’m glad you are admitting that our current policy is incoherent. Well there is a starting point.

Since it’s obviously flawed why Republicans supporting it?

---

In order to play ‘devil’s advocate’ to our foriegn policy we would need to have a cohherent foriegn policy first.

Can you name any foriegn policy principle that Obama has stuck to over the past year?

MikeGolf | Jan 28, 2010

---

Then the GOP should play devil’s advocate instead of presenting misinformation.
Forget War Buy More | Jan 28, 2010

---

the roman empire had the same problems
dylanfox | Jan 28, 2010

---

It’s Obama’s foreign policy now…

And I think the Republicans Applauded him for sending more troops to Afghanistan.

And it was the Democrats that protested.
Dina W | Jan 28, 2010

---

doesn’t seem like they can do much except criticize the president for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. i am wanting to hear more of a detailed plan coming from them. i am still very disappointed
lovin'30! | Jan 28, 2010

---

I think eight years of Republican expertise in foreign policy is enough. Two wars and possibly other conflicts in the future.
I hate to think about it.
thanks
telwidit | Jan 28, 2010

---

the repubs. will have to leave their own selfish self to understand anything, won’t happen any time soon, and remember the romans, they had the same selfish behavior
rudens | Jan 28, 2010

---

cuzz as of now obama has not changed our foriegn policy hes still doing the same thing bush has been doing
John | Jan 28, 2010

---

Last night, Obama whined that the Republican party opposed everything he did. "Opposing everything is not the way to lead!" Well, you make a good point. Obama had no basis to whine. We simply oppose what we disagree with. We don’t oppose him merely to make political points. If he would acknowledge our support of his foreign policy, slow, ponderous and timid as it may be, he could recognize this fact.

In response to your question though, it is because, for the most part, we agree with it. Don’t want to be the ‘world police’? Fine. We’ll pull back and let nations rebuild their own armies. Let’s let Germany, Japan and every other nation devote their resources to build up their military strength so that they can defend themselves. Or, we can be the world police, allow these nations to have limited armies and maintain a relative peace. (Hard to start a war if you don’t have anything to fight with.) See? I trust the United States. I do not trust other nations.

And we are rarely ‘preemptive’. When we are, it is because thousands or tens of thousands of American lives may be at stake. Call me crazy, but I’d prefer to act before that happens.
RitchWilliams | Jan 28, 2010

Pay It Forward (2000) IMDB rating: 6.70 Plot: A school social studies assignment leads to social changes that spread from city-to-city. Assigned to come up with some idea that will improve mankind, a young boy (Haley Joel Osment) decides that if he can do three good deeds for someone and they in turn can “pay it forward” and so forth, positive changes can occur. What appears to initially be a failure, is indeed a success that is not immediately known but is traced backwards by a reporter who is a benefactor. The initial recipients of the boy are a drug addict (James Cavaziel), his badly scarred school teacher (Kevin Spacey), and his alcoholic mother (Helen Hunt). While physically and mentally scarred by past events, the teacher is not the only one bearing scars. The young boy fears his mother’s fate, particularly at his brutal, alcoholic father’s (Jon Bon Jovi) hands. The mother also bears scars from her childhood with a homeless, alcoholic mother (Angie Dickinson).

Actors: Spacey Kevin,Osment Haley Joel,Mohr Jay,Caviezel James,Bon Jovi Jon,Ramsey David,Werntz Gary,Donato Marc,Drama,Romance,

My chances for paternal custody?
So, I have a son due to be born in late April, and recently the mother and I have had some turmoil.

A little background between her and I: There was never really a RELATIONSHIP per se… it was one of those things that happened, and the result was that we have a son on the way.

Despite the circumstance, I’m ecstatic about it; he will be my first and I already have a nursery set up, my mother (soon-to-be grandma) has a nursery at her house, I have already made arrangements with the state for child support garnishments and really, it seems most things are arranged as they should be.

The mother and myself were on very good, civil terms. We agreed that it may not be the right thing to force an incompatible relationship solely for the reason of a child. We could be effective and loving parents, even if we were not together.

Fast forward to about a week ago. She has, for some unknown reason, become very spiteful and bitter; she feels that I should let her move in with me and that I should not see other people (even though I’m not!), and that overall I’m a jerk for not wanting a relationship.

Anyways, the question at hand is… what are my chances for full paternal custody?

I’m a 28 year old recent graduate with a Biochemistry/Biotechnology degree. I have an excellent job that provides full benefits for myself and my son, I have my own place and an excellent support group of family and friends. I’m a non-smoker, no drugs, occasional drinker, and an ultra-hard worker.

My home life is fairly tame, just me and the dog with a frequent visiting of friends and family and neighbors.

Her lifestyle, on the other hand… just seems so non-conducive to raising a healthy child. She is a frequent smoker.. I even paid for her to have auricular therapy to quit while pregnant, and she lasted a whole 3 hours. She lives with some other guy who is the father of her other child, and who only lets her stay there so he doesn’t have to pay child support. He constantly threatens to kick her out, at which point she would have nowhere to go. She has never had a job in her life other than as a stripper. She is entirely unwilling to go get a job, and says the child support she will get will be enough. She didn’t even graduate high school, she drops F-bombs and cusses all the time around her 2 year old son. She asks her son to go get her cigarettes for her, and smokes in the house, right in front of him. She can’t have a bank account because she owes like $5,000 to her previous bank. She got denied government housing because of bad credit (that’s bad).

Her family is extremely narcissistic and dysfunctional, they provide no support or help for her. Hell, her Mom can’t even get her own apartment, her sister is a recovering drug addict. The only rational one in her family is her brother, and he can’t even make decisions without his family down his neck.

Grr! it’s so frustrating because I can’t exactly prove her "unfit," but I’d be damned if a court tells me to my face that my son is going to be better off with her than with me.

So, are there any fathers out there that have gone for full custody… and won?

Help =(

---

No idea. but good luck.
And nice to see a guy so willing to face his own resbonsibilties.
MG B | Jan 31, 2010

---

I think you do have a good shot, especially if you hire an attorney. Perhaps the reason she is suddenly so bitter and angry is it’s getting closer to the time she will deliver and she is upset that she isn’t having this baby under ideal circumstances (i.e. a stable relationship). Anyway I’m sorry to hear you are going through this and courts are usually very difficult to persuade one to take a child away from it’s mother so you do have an uphill battle but I would definately fight for it. You didn’t mention anything about where you would place the child while you were at work so that’s another thing you need to consider before bringing your case to a judge, but all in all I do think your chances are very good. Good luck!
Natalie | Jan 31, 2010

---

first, being a stripper is NOT illegal, and can not be used as her being a bad mom,, nor is her smoking.. nor is her living with anyone,, he may be a d*ck but he is the father of her baby and that always looks good to a court.. weather you like it or not..

nor does how much money she might owe someone, or that she did not graduate high school or cuses..

you would have to get her proved a bad mother,, and from what you say, these reasons are not enough..
LadyCatherine | Jan 31, 2010

Escaflowne (2000) IMDB rating: 7.00 Plot: High school student Hitomi Kanzaki, depressed and despondent, wishes to disappear from her world. Her wishes are heard in the alternate world of Gaea where a battle for absolute control is raging! Magically, Hitomi is suddenly transported to this other world and is bestowed with the power to decide its ultimate fate!

Actors: Seki Tomokazu,Nakata Joji,Tsujitani Koji,Miki Shinichiro,Devall Trevor,Dobson Brian,Dobson Michael,Dobson Paul,Drummond Brian,Francis Andrew,Hiyama Nobuyuki,Action,Animation,Adventure,Fantasy,Fantasy2,Drama,Romance,Anime,Thriller,Sci-Fi,

Angels in anime series/manga?
What are some anime series/ manga that have angels or angel-like characters that have wings? I know about these already..

Air
DN angel
Full moon wo sagashite
Vision of escaflowne

What are some other ones? :3

---

Ah, My Goddess!
Angel Tales

That’s all I know . . .
e-x-ouji-ai | Jan 03, 2010

---

+anima
Kamikaze kaito jeanne (?)
shura no kaji | Jan 03, 2010

---

Kamisama Kazoku (I think that’s how you spell it)
Its about this guy named Samatarou Kamiyama who is the son of God. Tenko is an angel that helps the whole family. One day in school, there is a transfer student that he falls for and he decides to go out with her without his family’s help. He is completely oblivious to Tenko’s feelings for him. It’s really good so you can try it.

I can’t think of anymore sorry.
Allison | Jan 03, 2010

---

angel sanctuary
Les U | Jan 03, 2010

Ghost Busters (1984) IMDB rating: 7.50 Plot: Peter Venkman, Ray Stantz, and Egon Spengler are three scientists at Columbia University in New York City. When their grant expires, the guys are fired and they go into business as a ghost extermination company called “Ghostbusters”. Their first customer is orchestra cello player Dana Barrett, who was scared out of her apartment on the 22nd floor of a high rise apartment building on Central Park West. It seems that Dana’s neighbor, Louis Tully, is also being affected by the strange happenings in the apartment building. Armed with proton guns, the Ghostbusters become wildly popular, and they are joined by Winston Zeddmore, who is looking for a job with good pay. Overzealous Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) agent Walter Peck thinks the Ghostbusters are frauds, and he has the Ghostbusters put in jail. Peck is forced to believe the Ghostbusters when New York City is put under siege by an ancient Sumerian God named Gozer the Gozerian, who is channeled through the apartment building that Dana and Louis live in, and the mayor has no choice but to let the Ghostbusters out of jail to face Gozer.

find and download Ghost Busters in DivX quaity

Actors: Murray Bill,Ramis Harold,Aykroyd Dan,Moranis Rick,Atherton William,Hudson Ernie,Margulies David,Tash Steven,Ensign Michael,Charney Jordan,Action,Comedy,Sci-Fi,Fantasy,

EMO, GOTH, NERD, NINJA, GHOST BUSTER, OR PIRATE?
What would u rather be and why?

---

Nerd, their smart and sometimes sexy.

Nicole | Jan 15, 2010

---

Pirate. Because I love they way they talk.
Starry-Eyed Surprise | Jan 11, 2010

---

NINJA!! A NINJA MONKEY YESH!! DEFINITELY!! NOTHING BETTER!!
AvanishaW | Jan 11, 2010

---

Pirate, argggg. get the booty
cat | Jan 11, 2010

---

How would anybody not choose Ghostbuster?
Fazz | Jan 11, 2010

---

ghost buster
idk why it just sounds funner than the rest
c?mz s??s ??-?-?? | Jan 11, 2010

---

Human.
Ms. Pelled Babby Schmidt | Jan 11, 2010

---

A fashionable ninja!
Katie | Jan 11, 2010

---

goth
MISTY